Hey pcs!
Enchanted Garden Bible Church(EGBC)
God's Universal Mandates
Ron Paul? Social Conservative?
Pray against pussyfooting around
Pray for America
Challenge Roe again!
1 peter comment and paraphrase
2 Pet 1
2pet 1:1-15
Justin Bieber and Sam Cornell
USURPIOUS (free novel)
James 5:14 to end
3/17/11 CrossDress Day Palm Springs High School
Hey pcs! Japan Quake Take!
JAMES 5:9-12
James 5:7&8
James 4:11-5:6
Condemnation of the rich!
EGBC God's Love System
James 3:13 to 4:10
Practical Prayer
Super Gladiator
James 1:22-2:10
James 2:10-3:5
James 3:1-3:13
Hebrews 7:8 -end,
Hebr. 1:1-7:7
2nd Timothy
1st Timothy
1 Thessalonians
Lovegate 1
Lovegate 2
Lovegate 3
Lovegate 4
lovegate 5
Lovegate 6
EGBC LoveGate 8
EGBC LoveGate 9
Lovegate Ten
Lovegate 11; Resistance testing to prepare and graduate Christians to Spiritual maturity at gate 12
child salvation
prayer format
Your child: Heaven or Hell!
Parental Determination vs. accountability
From Hell, inside you, via GE
Carly to the rescue
Autism and Injectable Hellish souls
They wait for us....in hell! 2/18/09
Obama's abortion push
Guilty of Abortion! Stand for sentencing!
2/10/09 Abort the mission?
Eclipse's choice, all must make?
NARAL ilk vs. Stephanie Meyer
Single Issue politics: examining abortion
expect jail time!
Doctor, nurse, Payback time, Sincerely, God.
Ode to O
Abolish Abortion Resources
Wicked NRA sells pro-life out to Pro-Abortion Terrorism lobby
Hallowe'en scarecrow was right
Prodeath abortioners like 'Bama bombing prolifers
Heard at Kaiser Perm.
Abortion's numbers, numbers, numbers.
Abortion protestants and catholics
Divine retaliation
Harsh Judgment against aborters
U.S. Blacks Push Abortion!
Obama's Abortion push heralds duality in a New Age
Grave Sins Have Consequences
Agree! By Jesus!
Black girl attacks pregnant black.
Pelosi gets StupakObama pervasive abortion bill.
pro life and abolition 01/31/09
Obama gives your taxes to abortionists
Sorry, Alan
Is Alan Keyes still languishing in Obama's jail? 5/23/2009
A real inaugural poem
Conscienscious objection from healthcare's fight agains the unborn
Obama Obortionist takes on world
"Profane America" DNC , D&C
New Years Message
Rush censors God to promote Heritage Assn.
Heathen rage! stupid cry!
oldbama and old-man-cession
Oldbama, Newbama
Obama is Disney's Rumpole (Shrek4ever)
Self employed under Obamaian attack?
Obama administration has thrown in the towel
Viva Espana! go Lance!
We can do more than insulate our faith groups!
Hey Pcs! celebrates 500th article page id
Voting contrasts
God's studio Production John 1
Hey pcs! Psalm 23!
John 2 workout
Unify with Rome! for life&protection
National Day of Prayer. Dud Bloomberg
$Your Money$
How to Stop Oil Spill!
Nat'l. Day to Pray for Transformation
The whole Bible speaks of Jesus Gen. 1:1 to 1:5
Solidarity with Rome
The Great Roman Catholic Escape?
Polish Coup?
IBEW union throws eggs! La Cucaracha Lalo Alcatraz blames Tea Party
Don't Ask em to enlist; Don't Tell em to re-enlist
By their fruits we shall know them
Bye bye NCAA Tourney, Obama's come-a-calling
Conceited or lonely?
Obama's health care last resort
Muzzles off Pastors
Why not 50% GNP for healthcare? If it's by individual freedom of choice
c's: lib or con?
God's Creativity
Eternal Security again
JSM SonLife F&Fs declare salvation insecure!
Too Bad For Tiger
Gangsta Bama a.k.a. Kneecapper
Alons! Rally to Sarah!
Rutten V. Tebow
Larded Layity; Porky Pastorate!
Meet the Browns
Protophorous, first brought
Parlay worries into disaster
Allah hates mutalab
2000-2010 reflections
Happy New Year, pcs!
Merry Christmas pcs
He Is Who He Says He Is
Hammer of Hanukah
Hannity Honeycoats Marxism
U.S. Troops are Iran's nuclear target, remove or defend them!
Obama's pagan Nobel speech
Nobel Prize for Abortionist
12/7/09 pearl harbor day ramblings
Christian position foreign to conservatives
Christ wants You as a Leader!
Soldier along, Major Hassan
Red Alert! Protect our troops!
Christian Priorities 4/28/2009
Yes, U.S., leave the middle east now
Don't draw wrong conclusion from 3rd party showing in NY23
Failed President Obama passes Healthcare
Payback for union thugs and goons
Obama Tutor: Fort Hood Shooter
dem. v. repo v. Christian 3rd
No Money: Mobilize!
God's Creative Commands
smug Chris Wallace
Sportslibs send $ to Michael J. FoxSports
Palm Springs Christian Wedding Association
race prejudice? Lib or con
Norm's ideas
Resume and Job seeker
Tithe 4 bad health, Token Traitor, Achilles Obama, Blue dog a Judas goat
Rush NFL Players good brain doctor.
Fat old Christian on Ob. Dem. healthplan
wh emails me&reply
10/21/09 notes pay czar ripoff, Obama f'd up the vaccine, CNN forbids Lamar Alexander on hit list
Rush Limbaugh Right on the Money 10/20/09
Obama Pledge: undo marriage protection
boycott SEIU services? 8/9/09
dam wrong
President Obama's UN Speech, humor
We want the boy media forgot
Hero of Belleviile W. Schoolbus
More Belleville HS bus beating
Free heathcare for new royalty
10/21 NFL not a Boycott update
NFL not a Boycott update.
No Boycott! Rush vs. NFL Censors
sorry no sports for me
phillies gifted
Conservatism's core.
cpm Christian Party transcends cons and libs
repo no more
3rd party!
Christian Political Party
what do we have to lose?
cpm Christian political movement
new cpm principles
Even more on CPM Party
cpm rallies
Christian Platform
Christian antiwar Third Party
Christians invited to dump repo party
Real con vs Rush con
Van Jones banned from Royal Barbershop
Unprosperous Persecutors
Whatever? neither right nor nescessity, just hogwash
Indoctrination issues: Obama school speech
Comrade Chairman Obama: All debate must end!
New Adventure begins!
Fending off science
Islam cuts off the hand.
L.A. Times on boycotting Beck's vs. Obama's racism
Fleishman's falsehoods in L.A.Times
diabolical democrats deal dirt to illegals
Worst ever: Watchmen, Tropic Thunder
9 Chickweed Lane
ponderrings leading to 7/7/2009
Wash. Post, only 25K$
economic collapse, Spiritual expansion, 6.15, 09
Honda Pilot's 4 Fedclunkers,
Dems djia dow jones lies
Agents Provocateur
Beautiful June day in Palm Springs
Sotomayor wonderful choice!
Can Ford compete with FedGovGMChrysler
Obama: Libya pay victims, Saudis pay zip! Saudi Royals gave to Obama's campaign
Ramirez didn't abort anybody or infect scores with AIDS
Rush is left
Dr. Dobson, which will he endorse?
Goose Gassage vs. Abdullah Protection Act
pageant's are pimps
Officiating Magic a win! Miss California a loss!
Dark Dupe
Sotomayor is a black power pick!
5/19 Pres. obama Notre Dame speech translated!
Jenkins fall guy as Obama arrests rival again 5/16/09
Obama arrests rival??? 5/11/2009
Shrill Christian voice? 5/14/09
Demjanjuk 5/12/09
Constalk's Core conservatism will fail! edited May 5
Stop! don't mug Mugabe
tired failed theories 5/3/09
Obama's press corps: enforcers?
Snitch expectations
ac now?
The Holy Spirit annoints Michael Savage 4/23/09
Godspeed Constalk radio 4/21/09
Cairo U. Lies Obama Told
Kabbalah for kids
robin vs. zimbabwe
Newsweek's Meacham panned
Filled, Led, Empowered
Bad Women hate Rush.
L.A.Times P.R.s Iranian Hitlerian
L.A.Times now L.A. "Stoner" Times?
Obamas ignore protocol
Obitburo: Obama plus politburo
One month to worst ever?
Wedding Guide
Christian course under Obama
Russia-freedom; Orange County-oppression!
L.A. Times editorial refuted
eight hundred churches
Hil Joyce Meyer Clinton
jesus is not in the stimulus
Can we boycott Big Pharma?
Dodgers need Manny Ramirez
1/29/09 extricate alternative? replacement!
1/26/09 extricate with 1/25 rescue concepts
Norman's stimulus proposal: Jubilee! 01/30/09
Filibuster now! No better time! 1/29/09
Icon Obama about to show abortion feet of clay!
Politics is religion!
Success to Obama?
pc response, No sympathy for the devil
Mark 1 Baptism into Christ's one body
Find the rockets
white right
L.A.Times editorial board supercilious
Burma/China find dupe in Barack Times
L.A. Times taunts "Stupid" subscribers
Blame for arson at Palin's church
Rehashed Crappuccino
Most newsworthy man! It's Mugabe!
Gone Gone Gone with the wind.
Thanksgiving Day Prayer
hired watchmen
Redistribute wealth my way!
Dem 2 way womb to tomb
Hindi slavers bad
Pray for President Obama
School sans Christ
How can we know?
Salton Sea
A.M.A. Equal Opportunity
Santa Klaus
The Bible
Tire Falter Fail
Barack (L.A.) Times spins holocaustic intent
persecution births Christintern
statistics not my forte from tipp poll
Save Children
The Issue
worldwide Christian persecution
Fear Christ!
Up with People!
Jesus and me
4 Laogai we 2 must die
Fear Factor
Korah, Dathan&Abiram Rebels
Surge or Savior
Round Bottom Bottle
4 for$5
Peter Principle: Obama as sports commentator
FLM Freedom
Give me a chance to succeed
Asahi, Saakashvili
10 commandments 1&2
Out of control
pcs and muslims
Scholar sans deus
Meet the new boss
L.A. Times China prop
ac/s ?
Black Knight
L.A. Barack Times responds to Obama's abortion lies at debate
Christian churchman
Watchman! Sound Alarm!
Dodgers'Angel Barroa
journal 10.07.08
Journal 10/05/08
Journal 10/03/08
Credit Crisis explain this! 5 % prime rate!!
Bye Bye bailout
NO bailout letter to congress!!
Solution to mortgage crisis
Bad call for Chargers
Bush Doctrine
journale 9/7/08
Sunday Sermon for Mashiach (annointed ) pastors
Manny, Tex&Blake
McCain life, Obama abortion
L.A. Times! A budding hero1
L.A. Times mugging Mugabe more
I Have a Dream
L.A. Times 6.16.08
6/14/08 latime's
2 fronts
6.13.08 L.A.Times
Marr. Eq. Party, PS
Clinton National Party
wedding officiant
L.A. Times 7/4 & 7/5 /08
Journal 5/19
Michael Savage right on!
One state
Wright race
Don't blame mom & dad
Don't give for Burma, Myanmar!!
Levi. 1-6
New Journal 4/5/08
indiramaggiegoldabhutto vs. bgdao
Keep yer health insur.
Norm's journale
Another primary vote for everyone
Why God Bless America McCain?
AFL-CIO Hoist on L.A.Times Hamburger Hook
happy gay guy
World can't complain
Peace, Peace, Yes there is Bush Peace!
Twin takers
Condi's Caste
Huck hunters on parade!
repo establishment
Christ vs. antiChrist
Dr. Dobson to endorse?
Repo debate venue
Hil's Schils
Media test
Pastor test
M. Vick
O. Curry
Ways of the Master
Dr. Muslim
viva la defect
Alpha Pope
live thru school
Ann Coulter
Genesis 3
Nat'l Prayer Day
Don't Fly
Feinstein's Unbirthday
America lost?
Duke Guilt
Foley's folly
Boycott Olympics!
Worth Remembering!
PC, did you know.....
novels stories plays etc.
Saved by the Coven
Happy homosexual
pro life and abolition 01/31/09

The tie that binds           

Where are all the Northern abolitionist preachers now?
History forgot them once,  Now why try?  only in it for temporal rewards, anyway.

FROM: The quandary of pro-life free speech: a lesson from the abolitionists

Albany Law ReviewSpring, 1999   by Lynn D. Wardle

The Effects of Roe on Women and Families

By declaring that the right to abortion is constitutionally ordained to be exclusively a woman's private decision, the Supreme Court in Roe endorsed the debasing, sexist notion that reproductive matters are really only women's "private" concerns. The subtext is that real men do not care about procreation, posterity, and mutuality in procreative and childbearing/rearing responsibilities. The Court, in essence, raised to constitutional status the age-old response of predatory men to the women whom they have sexually exploited for sexual gratification: "Oh, it is your problem. You take care of it!" That is the core message of the Supreme Court's doctrine of abortion privacy. The Supreme Court has abandoned women to their "privacy" and has essentially told them: "It is your private problem, you deal with it privately, and do not bother the public. You cannot look to the state for support in requiring the male to assume any procreative responsibility by forbidding him the option of pressuring you into a cheap and potentially deadly quickfix."

Is it any wonder that the male political leaders who have been most supportive of the ethics and policy of Roe v. Wade, like Senator Edward Kennedy, Senator Robert Packwood, and President William Jefferson Clinton, are the same leaders embroiled in sleazy scandals involving sexual exploitation of women? Is not the connection between viewing women as sexual playthings, and abortion-on-demand obvious? Roe mandates that states not interfere with the lifestyle that allows women to be sexually exploited, to be "rid" of the inconvenient pregnancy that may result from such behavior, and thus to liberate the woman for farther sterile, sexual exploitation. It liberates such men from the unglamourous responsibilities of concern, mutuality, connectedness, caring, procreation, child support, and child-rearing.(595) Is it any wonder that among the most common reasons given by women for having an abortion is lack of support, or opposition from (essentially fear of losing or preventing a relationship with), the sexual partner who fathered the unborn child?(596) Has Roe really empowered and protected women, or has it just made them more vulnerable to the manipulations of selfish, sexually predatory men?

Roe isolates pregnant women in exquisitely empty privacy. Under circumstances when mutuality is needed more than ever before, when joint procreative responsibility is most important, the Court has mandated that all laws in all states conform to a judicially-created model of procreative relationships that is divisive, centrifugal, and turgidly individualistic. Pregnant women are on their own. Fathers cannot be protected in their role as jointly responsible parents. States cannot preserve the right of husbands to even be notified of what may be the most important decision controlling his interests in, and hopes of, posterity. Roe and its progeny impose upon the nation a new model of family relations in which mutuality is not to be expected and in which procreation and child-rearing must be treated as inferior, disfavored roles and unwanted burdens. The Roe-model of procreative privacy "kills human relationships as efficiently as [abortion] kills unborn children."(597)

Roe has forced women to engage in a costly pretense that "abortion makes whatever hurts them feel better."(598) With all the resources we have to improve the contexts of women's lives, the Court mandates that the states offer them legalized abortion.

Does Roe really empower women and protect their autonomy or does it, as Catharine MacKinnon has pointed out, protect the doctor's autonomy just as much as the woman's?(599) Does Roe provide women with the illusion of control but really expose them to greater manipulation from sexually irresponsible men? Does Roe liberate women or bind women in the shadows of male sexual promiscuity? Does Roe benefit women or protect selfish male sexual predators?

Just when women were finally getting some political clout, the Supreme Court slammed the door to the statehouse in their faces by unilaterally decreeing in Roe that states could not support pregnant women in resisting the pressure of their male partners to "get rid of it."(600) Roe enshrined in the Constitution a particular ideology of sex and procreation that is hostile to one set of women and the men who support them, and supportive of another clique of women and the men who use them. Roe is fundamentally an attack upon the suffrage and political equality of women whose first commitment is to marriage and marital mutuality, who expect both parents to show equal responsibility for procreation and child-rearing, and who want state support for those roles and responsibilities. Roe compels lawmakers to disregard calls from these women for legal support for procreative mutuality and family integrity by restricting abortion. On the other hand, Roe gives absolute, unqualified legal priority to women who engage in nonmarital and extramarital sexual liaisons, who want to avoid procreative responsibilities, and who are willing to go to the extreme of killing their living, unborn offspring in order to prevent the birth of a child who would impose childrearing responsibilities or guilt upon them. Roe is hostile to the policy needs of families and to the women and men who would ask the law to support family integrity; Roe gives constitutional preference to the policy agendas of single, sexually-irresponsible women and the men who wish to use them for sexual pleasure without social or child-rearing commitment. The gender gap that Roe has created is not so much men versus women, but women and men who reject sexual and procreative responsibility, on one hand, versus women and men whose first commitment is to families and children, on the other. Roe decrees constitutional preference for single career women (and their male partners) over married women whose full-time commitment is to home and children.

Finally, growing evidence about the strong link between abortion and breast cancer (especially in young women), confirmed and reconfirmed in multiple studies, despite efforts by pro-choice advocates to dismiss and ignore the data,(601) raises further questions about whether abortion really is good for women (not to mention good public policy or good constitutional law).(602) It also undermines one of the stated justifications for the Roe decision--that abortion is "relatively safe."(603)

D. The Effects of Roe on Social Mores in General

Roe has been associated with a sordid web of misrepresentations and distortions from its beginning.(604) For example, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, (once head of the largest abortion clinic in the country and a leader of the pro-abortion movement at the time of Roe) has acknowledged the fabrication and inflation of claims about the number of women who died from illegal abortions.(605) NARAL's Kate Michelman's perpetuated that tactic by her emphatic denial that she said, "`We think abortion is a bad thing. No woman wants to have an abortion.'"(606) But the reporter stood by her report because she had taped the interview,(607) and that the "plausible deniability" cover-up attempt failed.(608)

Likewise, the multitude of lies and false testimony given to Congress and the public about partial birth abortion by representatives of the abortion industry has been publicly exposed.(609) Defenders of the ghastly practice were caught lying before Congress about how partial birth abortions are performed (lying that the anesthetic killed the baby), when they are performed (in the fifth and sixth months of gestation, not merely in the last three months, as emphasized in testimony), why they are performed (for elective reasons of personal convenience, not merely in cases of medical necessity as defenders of partial-birth abortion claim), and how many are performed (approximately 4000 to 5000 per year, not just a few hundred).(610) The Executive Director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers admitted on Nightline that he had "lied through [his] teeth" when he testified before Congress concerning the procedure.(611)

Abortion-on-demand litigation has contributed to the degeneration of social mores not only in its substance and policy, but also in its methods. Some who advocate abortion apparently believe that the ends justify the means, and that misrepresentation, distortion, and deception are legitimate methods to

"protect" and promote the "right" to abortion.(612) That is not surprising; lawyers have known for centuries that those who kill will also lie; and just as abortion involves the deliberate killing of a living-but-unborn human-in-utero, the legal doctrine of Roe is both based upon and has spawned a mountain of falsehoods, pious frauds, and legal myths.(613)

E. The Effects of Roe on the Quality of Life

One of the most striking dimensions of Roe is the cavalier disregard for the most vulnerable human beings on the fringes of life and society. The Supreme Court essentially created a new category of illegitimates in Roe, giving the imprimatur of the Constitution to public apathy about killing a potentially burdensome, powerless, unwanted class of human beings. If a living, growing, healthy human being deemed inconvenient to a single individual may not be protected in the earliest stages of life, what about those in the last, most burdensome and expensive stages of life? While the judgments in last year's assisted suicide cases reveal that the Court wants to avoid repeating the mistake of Roe,(614) the narrow judgments and fragmented opinions contain ominous uncertainties. Further, the connection between abortion and euthanasia has long been noted.(615)

Abortion is an act of violence. That is not a moral judgment, it is a statement of simple fact. Abortion is an act of deadly, intentional destructive violence. In fact, abortion is the most widespread form of domestic violence. And while the unborn may not be deemed "persons" in constitutional law, for those who consider the fetus to be an unborn child (which, in at least some circumstances most Americans do),(616) abortion could be described as the most deadly and most widespread form of child abuse. Is it any wonder, then, that since Roe legalized and popularized indiscriminate abortion, numbers and rates of other forms of child abuse have also skyrocketed?(617)


It has been said that those who will not learn from the mistakes of the past are destined to repeat them. Americans made a grave mistake a century and a half ago in their effort to stifle the expression of abolitionist speech.(618) The country today is poised to repeat that mistake.(619) Efforts to suppress abolitionist free speech in the generation before the Civil War did not end the abolitionist drive to eliminate slavery in the United States.(620) It only thrust the controversy into violence; it produced the martyrdom of John Brown and eventually a Civil War.(621) It should come as no surprise today to discover that when pro-life advocates who urge the abolition of elective abortions are denied the right to participate in making the laws that govern them on this issue (remember that Roe removed the issue from the political process); when they are told by judges and law enforcers that they cannot even peaceably picket, demonstrate or otherwise publicly express their anti-abortion views; when some are assaulted by pro-abortion workers, arrested, abused, treated with hatred and scorn, subjected to exorbitant fines, excessive penalties, and expensive attorneys fees, harassed with civil suits, and denied basic fairness and simple justice by the courts, it is tragic and wrong, but certainly not surprising if, under those conditions, some of those modern-day abortion abolitionists responded with acts of violence, just as it happened 150 years ago.(622) Acts of violence, intimidation, or lawlessness by anti-abortion activists are condemnable; those who commit such deeds should be pursued, caught, charged, tried, and if found guilty, punished to the full extent of the laws. Those who kill in the name of "pro-life" values are terribly and dangerously misguided. They impair the common weal, and are guilty of gross hypocrisy as well as of murder. Such violence is not only deplorable and detrimental, it is also strategically unnecessary. Yet violence by anti-abortion extremists who are denied their rights of free speech is as predictable as it is intolerable. The Court's own lawless abortion jurisprudence and myopic suppression of pro-life free speech are not unrelated. The lessons from the abolitionist-slavery struggle of 150 years ago are obvious, and because they are so obvious, it is tragic to witness our country ignore those lessons, make the same mistakes again, and begin to rekindle the same kind of violence and conflagration.(623)

We face an impending crisis. There are some moral issues that simply will not go away, that will not be suppressed, and some ideas are so powerful that they cannot be killed. There are some evils that are so compelling they cannot be ignored, or covered up, disguised or concealed. Slavery was such an evil. Abortion is another. There are some rights that are so fundamental that they cannot be suppressed forever. Free speech of abolitionists was irrepressible. Free speech by pro-lifers is likewise indomitable. Just as the abolitionists presented the first, great test of the nation's commitment to protecting the rights of unpopular speech, the anti-abortionists present the latest serious test of the nation's commitment to the free-speech values of the First Amendment, and to the notion of equality under law for those whose opinions are anathema to the powerful elites of American society

We must never underestimate the power of evil, the arrogance of evil, or the extremes to which those who practice and defend evil will go to muzzle, suppress, repress and extinguish voices that oppose them. As the pro-slavery population from 1830 to 1860 intensified their repressive tactics, with every victory pushing harder and going further to silence the abolitionist voices, likewise we see today an intensification of the tactics of pro-abortion forces to suppress pro-life free speech.(624) Convicted by the inner voices of their own consciences, facing rejection by their own human nature and unwilling to acknowledge their mistakes, they demand compensatory external acceptance and extravagant public support. Their desperate need for external social/legal/political approval intensifies as the inner moral scaffolding of their lives collapses, and the effort to silence those who disagree increases as the fiber of inner peace atrophies and dies. Those who would suppress pro-life free speech are serious; they are not to be trifled with; they are dangerous. History teaches that it would be naive to ignore them, or to underestimate the burdens that they will inflict upon abortion abolitionists who persist in their efforts to express their opposition to abortion-on-demand in the years ahead.

The history of the threat to free speech rights of unpopular abolitionists a century-and-a-half ago also teaches us the importance of the survival of our vital First Amendment by the Supreme Court clearly rejecting, resisting, and repudiating the temptations to cheat, cut corners, restrict, to deny to advocates of unpopular antiabortion speech the equal enjoyment of full constitutional protections of free speech. For, regardless of one's views about abortion, the right of all Americans to express their opinions on that subject is a cornerstone for the continuation of our constitutional government and liberties.

The courts today are caught in a dangerous conflict of interest arising out of the Roe doctrine. They created the unpopular, controversial Roe rule which anti-abortion activists yearn to overturn by exercising their free speech rights, which the courts for many decades have been particularly responsible to protect. The conflict is apparent. The federal courts have resisted all legitimate political efforts to curtail that rule for a quarter-century, striking down virtually all significant abortion restrictions (save only limited parental participation and public funding restrictions). For a quarter-century, they have defied and denied the authority of the other branches of government, and of the states, to participate in the establishment of a policy on the profound social issue of the extent to which abortion should be restricted. They have repeatedly reaffirmed and expanded the Roe doctrine against repeated expression of state legislative dissatisfaction. They have endured much professional and political criticism for Roe. Now, the temptation for the courts to undermine the opposition to the rule by denying full First Amendment protections to pro-life free speech, and by upholding restrictions upon free expression which it would not uphold if applied to advocates of other unpopular ideas, cannot be ignored.

If the modern abortion-abolitionists are relegated to second-class citizenship by denial of their rights of free speech, our entire nation shall have lost something that cannot easily be recovered. The right to engage in unpopular speech about controversial social issues is not a gift of the courts, to be extended and withdrawn as they agree or disagree, are flattered or offended, or as they deem reasonable or misguided (even disturbing) the controversial speech involved. Rather, it is a sacred constitutional right which no official has the right or authority to diminish, and which the courts have the tremendous duty to protect. Many American courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have failed to give pro-life expression full and equal speech protection, and by their careful neglect, they have eroded the free speech rights of all who engage in unpopular, controversial, political speech

It is now time for the Supreme Court, and all courts, to take seriously the obligation to be especially careful of, and particularly protective of, the rights of those who strongly oppose the Court's Roe doctrine, to engage vigorously, seriously, and zealously, in pro-life free speech and responsible related expressive conduct. If Roe survives another quarter-century because of the judiciary's continuing double-standard of First Amendment protection (blatantly biased against anti-abortion speech, and their blind-eye disregarding of violations of the free-speech rights of anti-abortion protesters), the Constitution and the nation will have been more than twice impoverished. The cumulative effect of both vices--mandatory abortion-on-demand and suppression of pro-life free speech--combined is greater than the mathematical sum of the double loss of civic virtue. The risk of loss of First Amendment rights is particularly dangerous. Sooner or later, history shows, common reason, humanity, and the truths about abortion that have been buried beneath the ideology of abortion-on-demand will be rediscovered and reasserted, and Mr. Jefferson's first inalienable right will be vindicated again. But the loss of the constitutional protection of free speech, especially protection of the expression of unpopular ideas, most importantly for the right to criticize official rules established and nurtured by the powerful governmental institutions, including the body that is uniquely charged with protecting freedom of expression, may not so surely or so simply be recovered.

To read the whole article!

Hey pcs! Political Christians! SuperGladiators! We need a pc, party of Christ  “There is no cause more important than affirming the transcendent right to life of all human beings, the right without which no other rights have any meaning”  Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation, President Ronald Reagan, 1984   goodnorman@live.com