Bankrupt and desperate, the Los Angeles Times steps up its recovery plan
demeaning the two thirds of its readers who believe differently than they do. Charles Darwin’s birthday party is crashed,
The Times says, by a malodorous skunk, American Bible believing Christians. The presence of another view fills the Times with
disdain, it seems, as if there is no room for the other side of the argument in human discourse. As if its presence knocks
over a pseudo-intellectual domino which one by one will cause their entire theory to crash in the ruin of other historical
mistakes. Darwin’s hair-brain scheme epiphany shared origin of species conjecture with a reasoned implore to subjugate
the negro and oriental races to their “fitter” masters, the caucasions of England. On this preposterous lunacy
the bankrupt Times claims research was inspired to which millions owe their lives. What research? The Times writing is like
the whole lore of evolution: Unsupported except by proven hoaxes in fair number strung together whenever a harried student
has no time to explore them one by one.
Contrary to the bankrupt Times. American-style Biblical fundamentalism
as they editorially call it does not seek to discredit Darwinism nor undermine the teaching of evolution in public schools.
The fact that there is another side to the Times argument does both things
with stellar success except where speech is suppressed which is what the bankrupt Times truly is after. No diabolical “strategy”
exists, as the bankrupt Times accuses a nonexistent conspiracy in blind desperation. No genius required, genius the Times
claims to be busy changing the names, names inspired by the results of new research that are more and more unanswerable by
the evolutionary mistake’s partisans.
Since two thirds of us believe opposite of the bankrupt Times, perhaps
the courts are wrong in suppressing the other side of the argument in our public schools and elsewhere.
The Bible allows a long universe, including biological prehistoric creation,
and a short human span here. Uneasiness is proper when a theory dispels all known constraints on evil and all higher nobler
Any unprovable theory is mere surmise. Disproofs of the theory of evolution
are ignored. Belief in God is not the same as believing the Bible. Darwinian activists actively oppose belief in either. Why?
The suppression of research and evidence and disproofs is designed to turn the tables on God Himself and set us up in charge
to do whatever we want without constraint. The truth is not theology. Let it out of the box, liberal, let’s talk!!
It doesn’t help to send the bulk of us, your readers, a birthday
card about Darwin that we are a malodorous skunk while we ourselves are smothered under a speech suppressing hinquarter of
a bankrupt menstrual rag of a partisan newspaper!