Sunday March 29 L.A Times 2nd page full page article, “why
not try legalizing pot,” by Steve Lopez.
No, I didn’t waste my time reading it.
Now I know why the L.A. Times articles are so poorly written with strange
pronouncements of hitherto unknown supporting data for their ultraliberal positions with outright belittling of their readership
of their “stupid" readership. Are they are stoned out of their gourd over there? Really, it would explain a lot.
How about the article claiming faith in the creator is like being a stinking
skunk at their birthday celebration over complete universal acceptance of disproven Darwinian concepts. Or the putdown of
dissenting views on Rhodesia by saying, Hey, "It’s the economy, Stupid". We may be stupid, but we are not stoned on
How about the L.A. “Stoner Times” claiming important research
to improve humanity’s condition was promoted by disproven evolutionary concepts?
In real life, while the stoned educrat hours were whiled away, Michael
Behe and others were making the most remarkable microbiological discoveries and attendant theories and imaging so remarkable
that had not Darwinian inquisitors Caiaphas and Annas attacked them with the crucificatorial Darwinian stoner mob, there is
no telling what true research to improve humanity may have arisen.
Here are some answers to Steve Lopez’s sophomoric question:
Cancer, COPD, Emphysema.
Short term memory loss.
Loss of ambition
Arrested secondary sex characteristics development
Hours and hours of lost productivity, study and social interaction
Et cetera, including Inability and disinclination to read while
stoned, as in no L.A. Times reading. Equals L.A. Times never emerging from bankruptcy!