are social conservatives? They are Pro Life conservatives.
So, all the candidates are pro life.
What is the difference, then?
There is the second pledge. The perfect pro life position paper.
It leaves out Romney and Huntsman.
There is the record. It cancels
Romney. He was pro choice before he flopped pro life, worse, he bucked his religious
faith to be pro choice, a hard grained pro choicer, like Pelosi bucked her religious faith..
Then, there is Obamacare, the ACA. For
the first time in federal lawmaking abortion practice is codified into federal law. Obama is the father
of it. A stark issue that Obama’s core base doesn’t understand. And, Obamacare
is Romneycare. So Romney can’t run against obama on a mighty core issue, and on which issue, much
of Obama’s core base sides with social consercatives. Yes the democrat registered voters are often
pro life and so are many Christian black voters.
Romney and Newt are both frozen out on this defining issue.
In his defense, Romney did go to Louisiana to stump for the personhood
amendment. No other pro life candidate can say that.
All is not lost, my buckoes. There is Ron Paul.
Ron Paul signed the second pledge. Ron Paul has been a pro life M.D.(expertise on the subject as
the best educated repo candidate) all along. His libertarian stance demands he advocate abolition
of Obamacare, with its legislated abortion regulations, codes, rules and requirements. Furthermore, Ron
Paul is now polling just as electable as Romney and even more electable than the others. That electability
lie fed the prochoice movement is satiated.(Lie because candidacies lead and influence and bring issues to the fore even if
they lose, and predicted losers often gain steam and win dragging the movement forward with it.)
But the Paul foreign policy, Conservatives
In Fiscal and Foreign Policy Only(CIFFPOs) may say.
America’s international involvements have been a total disaster.
Pulling in our horns will do us good. If Iran gets a nuke, Israel has 200 Nukes to counter that
threat. Our involvement in Iraq destroyed a 2 million strong Christian community and made Iraq far worse
than it was. America’s failed foreign policy is responsible for twin disaster: million
Iraqi Christian refugees we were unwilling to import and a million dead Iraqi Christians is doubly an antilife foreign policy.
We should therefore listen to what Ron Paul says because we are obviously too stupid a nation to get involved
in foreign entanglements without doing grave harm. Is it repetitive to say, no Irani/Israeli nuclear confrontation
will match the two million lives harm done by our Iraqi entanglement. A similar misery at our hands may
well befall the Armenian Christian church in Iran if we stupidly entangle ourselves. There. How many dead
Christians can we bear the blame for, before God wipes us out as a nation. Ron Paul foreign policy deserves
to be looked at in the light of American stupidity rampant on Obama and GW Bush foreign policy watches. No
candidate but paul even recognizes the sorrows we’ve caused and the potential for worse by our idiotic foreign entanglements.
Finally, Ron Paul has shown at
last that he is not afraid to attack the evil and the failed and the stupid policies of other republican leaders.
How much more will the brilliant young men who support him bring all of Obama’s corruption, machinations, pro
abortion excesses, et cetera, into the stark light.
Lastly and most importantly, Paul
is now shown by polling data to be equally electable against Obama as Romney and more electable than all
the rest. Additionally, by the social makeup of his supporters and by his prolife and antiwar (not antidefense) ideology,
he alone is capable of raiding Obama's base.
Why run a corporate raider who is a minority
against an incumbent with a billion dollars to spend attacking those weaknesses. I am not antifreedom in the economy,
but we risk running Carl Icahn and infamous corporate raider, Victor Posner, except that they changed into Mormons.
I respect the place Jesus has in the mormon church name, but a lot of Christians see the canon of scripture as closed
in 96 ad and are going to grit their teeth to swallow mormon kool aid and Climate change requiring government involvement kool
aid with pro abortion flopjacks, to vote for a renowned corporate raider.